Saturday, 25 February 2017

Properties of Information Science

Properties of Information Science: 

Information Science 

The Science that investigates the properties and behavior of information, the forces governing the flow of information, and the means of processing information for optimum accessibility and usability. The processes include the organization, dissemination, collection, organization, storage, retrieval, interpretation and use of information.
If one accepts that information is a critical aspect of our lives and our society as a whole, than Librarians and other information specialists must developed information systems that can acquire, organize, maintain, and this disseminate information with minimum effort and cost to users. In information science there are countless areas that have direct and indirect application to the work of libraries and librarian.
Information science in some form has been around for a very long time, although it may not have been called by that name. Libraries, Librarianship, bibliography, for example, are part of the foundation of information science. The history of libraries and Librarianship is primarily one collecting, organizing, and disseminating materials, largely of the print verity.
For Libraries, these differences may have a profound effect on how a library is used. An information seeker may be looking for a specific items, asked the reference librarian a specific query, have a specific time requirement. An information gatherer may browse a collection in a specific area without need for specific information or time requirements. Newspaper and magazine collections may be best suited, although not exclusively, for information gatherers, while reference materials may be best suited for information seekers.

People usually search for Information in some Type of Context

People seldom seek information as an end in its self; the usually seek it within a particular context what Durance 1989 refers to as a “problem environment. The individual trying to solve a particular problem or make a particular decision. A scientist may be trying to locate information on a procedure, an English teacher trying to locate an essay, a neighbor trying to repair a refrigerator, or a minister seeking quotations for a sermon.
Nonetheless, information-seeking research suggests that we should not be too restrictive if we are actually to deal with why individuals come to ask their questions, the traditional prohibitions of the library come to ask their questions, the traditional prohibitions of the library profession notwithstanding.

People prefer Personal rather than Institutions Sources to satisfy their information needs

There is little doubt that individual are very likely to consult the most convenient human sources before they appeal to an institutional one. When an information need arises, one’s memory is most likely to be checked first before seeking other sources for information.

Failing this, individual attempt to seek the information from external sources, human are institutional. The research suggests that when faced with an information need, people are more likely first to seek individual rather than institutional. This means that individuals are more likely to contract their doctors, clergy, coworkers, or neighbors before coming to the library. The quality of the information may or may not be as good, but people are the preferred sources of information.
People seldom see librarians as a source of information
There is discouraging evidence that when individuals have an information need, they do not think of libraries or librarians as a primary source of information. Chen, in a large study of information seekers in New England. In addition, if people really prefer human rather than insinuations sources of information, emphasizing the librarian rather than the library might increase individual use of the library. In other words, “humanizing” the library may well reduce resistance to its use.

Information Seeking is a Dynamic Process

Studies suggests that the search for information generally goes through a variety of phases beginning with an undefined notion that there is a need for information, which is referred to as an “anomalous state of knowledge (ASK)”. Kuhlthau (1991) has proposed that an information seekers generally goes through a six-stage process, which she refer to as the information search process (ISP). The stages are explain in an abbreviated fasion below:

Stage 1 Initiation
This stage is characterizes by uncertainty as the information seeker realizes that he or she has a need for some knowledge or understanding. The need is still unfocused; the individual has not yet defined the topic or the approach to be taken and may discuss possible courses of action with others.

Stage 2 Selection
The information seekers begins to focus on a particular topic and begins to explore the best approaches for meeting the information need. Some tentative attempt to gather information on the topic begin.

Stage 3 Exploration
The information seeker begins serious exploration of the topic, gathering information to provide orientation the information seeker may still have a considerable sense of confusion or doubt because the information may appear to be contradictory.

Stage 4 Formulation
This stage is critical as the seeker begins to establish a clear focus for the exploration and feelings of uncertainty begin to diminish. Rather than just collecting information, the seeker begins to evaluate critically the information obtain, accepting some information and discarding information that appears to be irrelevant.



Stage 5 Collection
The focus is now clear, and the information seeker collects only information related to the defined topic. The seeker is able to articulate clearly the type of information needed, the search process becomes more effective, uncertainty is reduced, and the seeker’s confidence is increased further.
Stage 6 Presentation:
The search for information is now complete, although the success of the search may very depending on factors search as availability of information, the effectiveness of the information system used, and the skills of the searcher.    

Barrier of Information

In addition to the findings noted above, information scientists have investigated a variety of factors that impair or prevent information seeking. These barriers include the following:

Physical Aspects

It is known that the location of a library has an impact on its use. Libraries that are geographically remote or difficult to reach are bound to create significant problems for those seeking information. Similarly, libraries that are difficult to enter or negotiate, especially for those with physical disabilities, will have restricted. No Doubt, collections with a poor physical arrangements or poor signage will also exacerbate the problems of information access.
Policy and procedural aspects:
Often libraries create rules, regulations, and procedures that inhibit the use of materials and services. Sometimes there are very good reasons for these rules, but they can have undesired effects. Restrictive circulation or reference policies; inadequate operating hours; limited use of meeting rooms; restricted use because of age, poor training, or poor scheduling of library staff; inadequate or inappropriate allocation of fiscal resources all can be impediments to information seeking.

Economic/Financial Aspects

The ability to afford the latest and best information technology and other information resources has a direct impact on the ability of information seekers to find what they need. Even when such resources are available library economics have sometimes significantly altered the direction of library services to a “fee-for-service” perspective.

Legal Aspects

Laws and regulations governing the flow of information, such as copyright law, inevitably affect the dissemination of information. Similarly, laws governing the restriction of certain types of information or images, such as those governing access to sexually explicit or violent materials to children and adults, limit the types of information that can be made available. This situation is likely to worsen because there is growing concern over the accessibility of such information on the internet.

Social Aspects

A troubling but common finding in studies of library users is that those most likely to use libraries have more formal education, tend to have higher incomes, and are white. There may be many reasons for this, but some may relate to the way members of minority groups perceive the library. If libraries are perceived as aristocratic, authoritarian institutions, unfriendly and unresponsive to minorities, then these groups are bound to have diminished enthusiasm for libraries as sources of information

No comments:

Post a Comment